|
|
I have Swarovski scopes on all of my guns, so I know and appreciate the high end quality, but for my spotting scope, I chose Carl Zeiss. If you have got your heart set on Swarovski, than this won't change your mind. I have a Zeiss Diascope 65T* FL 15-45. Took it sheep hunting last fall and it was great. It focuses easier than swarovski IMO. You can't go wrong with it, and if you want more power you can get it in the 85t* FL 20-60. It has better edge to edge clarity. The price in Cabelas is 2150.00 for the one I got and 2500.00 for the higher power. You can get them for much cheaper on ebay. Good luck.
|
| |
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by alaskaguide: Yeah, I am leaning heavily toward the ATS 80 HD. Have you tried the 80mm lenses? Or do you just prefer the 65mm? I would think the extra 15mm of field view would be nice. Thoughts?
I have not tried the 80mm. I was trying to go as light and packable as possible.
|
| |
| Posts: 21 | Location: Alaska | Registered: October 07, 2006 |  
IP
|
|
|
|
I have had almost all the premium spotting scopes and I can tell you with certainty that swarovski's HD is a waste of money. Anyone who says they can see a difference between swaros standard and hd scopes are full of bs. Even an honest swarovski rep will tell you to save your money unless you plan on digiscoping. In my opinion the feild of view isn't much better with the 80mm, but the bigger lens does help with heat waves. I like most zeiss products, but their spotting scopes are poor. Every one I have looked through has extremely fuzzy edges. I would also recommend an angled body unless you do all your hunting out of a pickup truck.
|
| |
|